Table 3.

Multivariable analyses of the association of M-CHIP with OS

HR95% CIP value
Cohort A: patients who had NGS testing before first treatment    
No M-CHIP Ref Ref  
1 M-CHIP mutation 0.2 0.03-1.7 .14 
≥2 M-CHIP mutations 4.7 1.4-15.9 .01 
Age at time of NGS (each 1-y increase) 1.1 1.06-1.1 <.0001 
Cohort C: entire cohort    
No M-CHIP Ref Ref  
1 M-CHIP mutation 0.9 0.5-1.6 .65 
≥2 M-CHIP mutations 2.2 1.04-4.8 .039 
Age at time of NGS (each 1-y increase) 1.1 1.05-1.1 <.0001 
History of treatment 3.9 2.5-6.2 <.0001 
HR95% CIP value
Cohort A: patients who had NGS testing before first treatment    
No M-CHIP Ref Ref  
1 M-CHIP mutation 0.2 0.03-1.7 .14 
≥2 M-CHIP mutations 4.7 1.4-15.9 .01 
Age at time of NGS (each 1-y increase) 1.1 1.06-1.1 <.0001 
Cohort C: entire cohort    
No M-CHIP Ref Ref  
1 M-CHIP mutation 0.9 0.5-1.6 .65 
≥2 M-CHIP mutations 2.2 1.04-4.8 .039 
Age at time of NGS (each 1-y increase) 1.1 1.05-1.1 <.0001 
History of treatment 3.9 2.5-6.2 <.0001 

Boldface indicates significant P value of <0.05.

F, female; HR, hazard ratio; M-CHIP, myeloid clonal hematopoeisis of indeterminate potential; NGS, next-generation sequencing; y, year.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal