Table 1.

Baseline characteristics

Patient characteristicsN = 152
Median age, y (range) 61 (19-90) 
Female 72 (47%) 
Performance status  
0-1 93 (82%) 
≥2 21 (18%) 
Missing 38 
Clinical disease type  
De novo 120 (79%) 
Secondary 27 (18%) 
Therapy-related 5 (3.3%) 
Disease status  
Refractory to last line of therapy 53 (35%) 
Relapse 99 (65%) 
No. of prior lines of therapy (range) 1-6 
98 (64%) 
≥2 54 (36%) 
Previous therapies  
FLT3 inhibitor  63 (41%) 
Midostaurin 58 (38%) 
Quizartinib 3 (2.0%) 
Sorafenib 7 (4.6%) 
Intensive chemotherapy 121 (80%) 
Venetoclax 37 (24%) 
Allogeneic transplant 29 (19%) 
Intensity of first-line AML therapy  
Intensive chemotherapy (DA, FLAG-Ida or CPX-351) 117 (77%) 
Low intensity (azacitidine or LDAC with/without venetoclax) 35 (23%) 
Venetoclax with azacitidine or LDAC 22 (14%) 
Patient characteristicsN = 152
Median age, y (range) 61 (19-90) 
Female 72 (47%) 
Performance status  
0-1 93 (82%) 
≥2 21 (18%) 
Missing 38 
Clinical disease type  
De novo 120 (79%) 
Secondary 27 (18%) 
Therapy-related 5 (3.3%) 
Disease status  
Refractory to last line of therapy 53 (35%) 
Relapse 99 (65%) 
No. of prior lines of therapy (range) 1-6 
98 (64%) 
≥2 54 (36%) 
Previous therapies  
FLT3 inhibitor  63 (41%) 
Midostaurin 58 (38%) 
Quizartinib 3 (2.0%) 
Sorafenib 7 (4.6%) 
Intensive chemotherapy 121 (80%) 
Venetoclax 37 (24%) 
Allogeneic transplant 29 (19%) 
Intensity of first-line AML therapy  
Intensive chemotherapy (DA, FLAG-Ida or CPX-351) 117 (77%) 
Low intensity (azacitidine or LDAC with/without venetoclax) 35 (23%) 
Venetoclax with azacitidine or LDAC 22 (14%) 

DA, daunorubicin and cytarabine; FLAG-Ida, fludarabine, cytarabine, granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) and idarubicin; LDAC, low-dose cytarabine.

Five patients previously exposed to both midostaurin and sorafenib.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal