Table 2.

Clo and Flu exposures as continuous variables are not associated with clinical outcome

CloFlu
P value
univariable
HR (95% CI)P value univariableHR (95% CI)P value multivariableHR (95% CI)
OS .20 1.32 (0.88-1.97) .50 1.06 (0.90-1.25) 
EFS .13 1.31 (0.94-1.83) .37 1.07 (0.93-1.23) 
GRFS .20 1.26 (0.88-1.79) .58 1.04 (0.90-1.2) 
TRM .98 1.01 (0.43-2.4) .49 0.90 (0.65-1.24) 
Relapse .43 1.17 (0.79-1.74) .27 1.09 (0.94-1.26) 
Graft failure .07 2.12 (1.00-4.49) .21 1.27 (0.90-1.80) 
aGvHD .86 1.05 (0.62-1.78) .93 0.99 (0.84-1.17) 
cGvHD .30 0.70 (0.36-1.37) .18 0.72 (0.44-1.17) 
CD4 IR .41 1.14 (0.84-1.55) .03∗ 1.14 (1.02-1.276) .18 1.08 (0.96-1.22) 
CloFlu
P value
univariable
HR (95% CI)P value univariableHR (95% CI)P value multivariableHR (95% CI)
OS .20 1.32 (0.88-1.97) .50 1.06 (0.90-1.25) 
EFS .13 1.31 (0.94-1.83) .37 1.07 (0.93-1.23) 
GRFS .20 1.26 (0.88-1.79) .58 1.04 (0.90-1.2) 
TRM .98 1.01 (0.43-2.4) .49 0.90 (0.65-1.24) 
Relapse .43 1.17 (0.79-1.74) .27 1.09 (0.94-1.26) 
Graft failure .07 2.12 (1.00-4.49) .21 1.27 (0.90-1.80) 
aGvHD .86 1.05 (0.62-1.78) .93 0.99 (0.84-1.17) 
cGvHD .30 0.70 (0.36-1.37) .18 0.72 (0.44-1.17) 
CD4 IR .41 1.14 (0.84-1.55) .03∗ 1.14 (1.02-1.276) .18 1.08 (0.96-1.22) 

Cox proportional hazards and Fine and Gray competing risk models were used for the evaluation of time-to-event data. Factors were entered into multivariable models if P value < .05. In multivariable analyses, ATG exposure was considered as covariable for CD4 IR. CD4 IR was defined as >50 CD4+ T cells per μL within 100 days after allo-HCT. P values < .05 were considered statistically significant.

OS, overall survival; EFS, event-free survival; GRFS, GVHD-free relapse-free survival, TRM, therapy-related mortality; aGvHD, acute GvHD; cGvHD, chronic GvHD; CD4 IR, CD4 immune reconstitution; CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio; ∗, P < .05.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal