Table 1.

Demographic and disease characteristics

CharacteristicN = 26
Sex, n (%)  
Male 14 (54) 
Female 12 (46) 
Median age, y (range) 59.5 (14-76) 
Race, n (%)  
Caucasian 18 (69) 
Black or African American 3 (12) 
Multiracial 1 (4) 
Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander 1 (4) 
Unknown or unspecified 3 (12) 
Ethnicity, n (%)  
Not Hispanic or Latino 19 (73) 
Hispanic or Latino 7 (27) 
Diagnosis, (%)  
Acute myeloid leukemia 8 (31) 
Acute lymphoblastic leukemia 5 (19) 
Chronic myeloid leukemia 2 (8) 
Chronic lymphocytic leukemia 1 (4) 
Myelodysplasia/myeloproliferative 3 (12) 
Sickle cell anemia 2 (8) 
Multiple myeloma 1 (4) 
Other  4 (15) 
Transplant type, n (%)  
Haploidentical 12 (46) 
Mismatched unrelated 9 (35) 
Matched unrelated with T-cell depletion 4 (15) 
Umbilical cord blood 1 (4) 
Preconditioning type, n (%)  
Myeloablative 12 (46) 
Reduced intensity/nonmyeloablative 14 (54) 
CMV donor (D)/recipient (R) serostatus, n (%)  
D−/R+ 7 (27) 
D+R+ 9 (35) 
D+/R− 3 (12) 
D−/R−  7 (27) 
Receiving letermovir at baseline, n (%) 16 (62) 
GVHD prophylaxis, n (%)  
ATG 4 (15) 
PTCy 21 (81) 
Viremia at study day 1, n (%)   
BKV 8 (31) 
HHV-6 5 (19) 
EBV 2 (8) 
AdV 1 (4) 
None 14 (54) 
CharacteristicN = 26
Sex, n (%)  
Male 14 (54) 
Female 12 (46) 
Median age, y (range) 59.5 (14-76) 
Race, n (%)  
Caucasian 18 (69) 
Black or African American 3 (12) 
Multiracial 1 (4) 
Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander 1 (4) 
Unknown or unspecified 3 (12) 
Ethnicity, n (%)  
Not Hispanic or Latino 19 (73) 
Hispanic or Latino 7 (27) 
Diagnosis, (%)  
Acute myeloid leukemia 8 (31) 
Acute lymphoblastic leukemia 5 (19) 
Chronic myeloid leukemia 2 (8) 
Chronic lymphocytic leukemia 1 (4) 
Myelodysplasia/myeloproliferative 3 (12) 
Sickle cell anemia 2 (8) 
Multiple myeloma 1 (4) 
Other  4 (15) 
Transplant type, n (%)  
Haploidentical 12 (46) 
Mismatched unrelated 9 (35) 
Matched unrelated with T-cell depletion 4 (15) 
Umbilical cord blood 1 (4) 
Preconditioning type, n (%)  
Myeloablative 12 (46) 
Reduced intensity/nonmyeloablative 14 (54) 
CMV donor (D)/recipient (R) serostatus, n (%)  
D−/R+ 7 (27) 
D+R+ 9 (35) 
D+/R− 3 (12) 
D−/R−  7 (27) 
Receiving letermovir at baseline, n (%) 16 (62) 
GVHD prophylaxis, n (%)  
ATG 4 (15) 
PTCy 21 (81) 
Viremia at study day 1, n (%)   
BKV 8 (31) 
HHV-6 5 (19) 
EBV 2 (8) 
AdV 1 (4) 
None 14 (54) 

Adrenoleukodystrophy, cutaneous γ-δ T-cell lymphoma, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, T-cell prolymphocytic leukemia.

One patient was reported as CMV D−/R− but had CMV viremia. Upon investigation by the site, the patient was previously reported as R+ but was presumed to have lost their CMV antibody positivity in a prior chimeric antigen receptor T-cell process.

Eight patients had viremia with a single virus (BKV, n = 4; HHV-6, n = 3; and EBV, n = 1), and 4 had viremia with 2 viruses (BKV + HHV-6, n = 2; AdV + BKV, n = 1; and BKV + EBV, n = 1).

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal