Table 3.

Time to platelet response

VariableTotal (n = 138)Statistical significance (P value)
No. of days to platelet response, median (IQR) 11 (7-21)  
No. of days to platelet response stratified by variables   
Age (<65 y vs ≥65 y), d 16.1 vs 18.7 .531 
Sex (men vs women), d 17.7 vs 18.2 .921 
Baseline platelet count (<20 × 109/L vs ≥20 × 109/L), d 18.1 vs 17.7 .937 
Prior therapy with IVIG (yes/no), d 17.8 vs 17.9 .981 
Prior therapy with TPO-RAs (yes/no), d 18.4 vs 17.0 .514 
Prior therapy with rituximab (yes/no), d 32.0 vs 12.8 .000 
Splenectomized vs nonsplenectomized, d 13.2 vs 18.5 .370 
Bleeding at diagnosis (yes/no) 19.0 vs 15.0 .431 
Charlson comorbidity index at diagnosis (0 vs ≥1), d 18.4 vs 17.1 .752 
Fostamatinib received in first/second line vs third line or later, d 14.0 vs 18.2 .538 
Fostamatinib use in primary ITP vs secondary ITP, d 17.6 vs 19.5 .786 
Fostamatinib monotherapy vs use in combination, d 15.0 vs 22.4 .076 
Platelet count at fostamatinib initiation (<20 × 109/L vs ≥20 × 109/L), d 20.8 vs 14.7 .128 
Fostamatinib use in chronic ITP vs nonchronic ITP, d 19.0 vs 16.7 .877 
VariableTotal (n = 138)Statistical significance (P value)
No. of days to platelet response, median (IQR) 11 (7-21)  
No. of days to platelet response stratified by variables   
Age (<65 y vs ≥65 y), d 16.1 vs 18.7 .531 
Sex (men vs women), d 17.7 vs 18.2 .921 
Baseline platelet count (<20 × 109/L vs ≥20 × 109/L), d 18.1 vs 17.7 .937 
Prior therapy with IVIG (yes/no), d 17.8 vs 17.9 .981 
Prior therapy with TPO-RAs (yes/no), d 18.4 vs 17.0 .514 
Prior therapy with rituximab (yes/no), d 32.0 vs 12.8 .000 
Splenectomized vs nonsplenectomized, d 13.2 vs 18.5 .370 
Bleeding at diagnosis (yes/no) 19.0 vs 15.0 .431 
Charlson comorbidity index at diagnosis (0 vs ≥1), d 18.4 vs 17.1 .752 
Fostamatinib received in first/second line vs third line or later, d 14.0 vs 18.2 .538 
Fostamatinib use in primary ITP vs secondary ITP, d 17.6 vs 19.5 .786 
Fostamatinib monotherapy vs use in combination, d 15.0 vs 22.4 .076 
Platelet count at fostamatinib initiation (<20 × 109/L vs ≥20 × 109/L), d 20.8 vs 14.7 .128 
Fostamatinib use in chronic ITP vs nonchronic ITP, d 19.0 vs 16.7 .877 

Variables with statistically significant differences or with a tendency to be statistically significant are indicated in bold.

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal