Table 4.

Scenario analysis of base-case results and NMBs assuming no adverse events from iron or RBC supplementation

StrategyCostIncremental costEffectiveness (QALY)Incremental effectiveness (QALY)NMBiNMB (95% credible interval)
Base-case model (health system perspective) 
Bevacizumab $428 000 — 9.3 1.0 $973 000 $432 000 (215 000-941 000) 
SOC $700 000 $272 000 8.3 — $541 000  
Base-case model (societal perspective) 
Bevacizumab $435 000 — 9.3 1.0 $967 000 $443 000 (218 000-973 000) 
SOC $717 000 $282 000 8.3 — $524 000  
StrategyCostIncremental costEffectiveness (QALY)Incremental effectiveness (QALY)NMBiNMB (95% credible interval)
Base-case model (health system perspective) 
Bevacizumab $428 000 — 9.3 1.0 $973 000 $432 000 (215 000-941 000) 
SOC $700 000 $272 000 8.3 — $541 000  
Base-case model (societal perspective) 
Bevacizumab $435 000 — 9.3 1.0 $967 000 $443 000 (218 000-973 000) 
SOC $717 000 $282 000 8.3 — $524 000  

Bevacizumab remains a cost-saving treatment even when the rates of adverse events from iron and RBC supplementation are reduced to 0.

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal