Pre-ASCT response rates and patients who underwent ASCT
Outcome . | Data set . | BV cohort . | Chemotherapy cohort . | P (χ2 test)∗ . | P (multivar)† . | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
n . | Total . | % . | n . | Total . | % . | ||||
Underwent ASCT | Whole | 335 | 386 | 87% | 324 | 382 | 85% | .38 | .064 |
Underwent ASCT | PET3 | 335 | 386 | 87% | 130 | 157 | 83% | .20 | .23 |
Underwent ASCT | Matched | 216 | 240 | 90% | 199 | 240 | 83% | .023 | .020 |
Underwent ASCT | Whole, relapsed | 156 | 173 | 90% | 262 | 304 | 86% | .20 | .012 |
Underwent ASCT | Whole, refractory | 179 | 213 | 84% | 62 | 78 | 79% | .32 | .40 |
Underwent ASCT | Whole, stage IV | 92 | 109 | 84% | 91 | 117 | 78% | .15 | .29 |
CMR | PET | 292 | 386 | 76% | 126 | 157 | 80% | .30 | .23 |
CMR | Matched‡ | 193 | 240 | 80% | 108 | 137 | 79% | .69 | .28 |
CMR | PET, relapsed | 148 | 173 | 86% | 78 | 90 | 87% | .72 | .75 |
CMR | PET, refractory | 144 | 213 | 68% | 48 | 67 | 72% | .67 | .11 |
CMR | PET, stage IV | 74 | 109 | 68% | 46 | 60 | 77% | .22 | .42 |
ORR (PET) | PET | 343 | 386 | 89% | 136 | 157 | 87% | .46 | .51 |
ORR (PET) | PET, relapsed | 164 | 173 | 95% | 81 | 90 | 90% | .14 | .11 |
ORR (PET) | PET, refractory | 179 | 213 | 84% | 55 | 67 | 82% | .71 | .43 |
ORR (PET) | PET, stage IV | 90 | 109 | 83% | 50 | 60 | 83% | .90 | .97 |
ORR (CT) | Whole | 343 | 386 | 89% | 300 | 382 | 79% | < .001 | < .001 |
ORR (CT) | Whole, relapsed | 164 | 173 | 95% | 238 | 304 | 78% | < .001 | < .001 |
ORR (CT) | Whole, refractory | 179 | 213 | 84% | 62 | 78 | 79% | .36 | .84 |
ORR (CT) | Whole, stage IV | 90 | 109 | 83% | 88 | 117 | 75% | .18 | .020 |
CMR ICE/BeGEV§ | PET | 292 | 386 | 76% | 105 | 157 | 67% | .025 | .0017 |
CMR ICE/BeGEV | Matched‡ | 193 | 240 | 80% | 93 | 137 | 68% | .005 | .0040 |
CMR ICE/BeGEV | PET, relapsed | 148 | 173 | 86% | 67 | 90 | 74% | .030 | .007 |
CMR ICE/BeGEV | PET, refractory | 144 | 213 | 68% | 38 | 67 | 57% | .067 | .15 |
CMR ICE/BeGEV | PET, stage IV | 74 | 109 | 68% | 39 | 60 | 65% | .69 | .11 |
Outcome . | Data set . | BV cohort . | Chemotherapy cohort . | P (χ2 test)∗ . | P (multivar)† . | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
n . | Total . | % . | n . | Total . | % . | ||||
Underwent ASCT | Whole | 335 | 386 | 87% | 324 | 382 | 85% | .38 | .064 |
Underwent ASCT | PET3 | 335 | 386 | 87% | 130 | 157 | 83% | .20 | .23 |
Underwent ASCT | Matched | 216 | 240 | 90% | 199 | 240 | 83% | .023 | .020 |
Underwent ASCT | Whole, relapsed | 156 | 173 | 90% | 262 | 304 | 86% | .20 | .012 |
Underwent ASCT | Whole, refractory | 179 | 213 | 84% | 62 | 78 | 79% | .32 | .40 |
Underwent ASCT | Whole, stage IV | 92 | 109 | 84% | 91 | 117 | 78% | .15 | .29 |
CMR | PET | 292 | 386 | 76% | 126 | 157 | 80% | .30 | .23 |
CMR | Matched‡ | 193 | 240 | 80% | 108 | 137 | 79% | .69 | .28 |
CMR | PET, relapsed | 148 | 173 | 86% | 78 | 90 | 87% | .72 | .75 |
CMR | PET, refractory | 144 | 213 | 68% | 48 | 67 | 72% | .67 | .11 |
CMR | PET, stage IV | 74 | 109 | 68% | 46 | 60 | 77% | .22 | .42 |
ORR (PET) | PET | 343 | 386 | 89% | 136 | 157 | 87% | .46 | .51 |
ORR (PET) | PET, relapsed | 164 | 173 | 95% | 81 | 90 | 90% | .14 | .11 |
ORR (PET) | PET, refractory | 179 | 213 | 84% | 55 | 67 | 82% | .71 | .43 |
ORR (PET) | PET, stage IV | 90 | 109 | 83% | 50 | 60 | 83% | .90 | .97 |
ORR (CT) | Whole | 343 | 386 | 89% | 300 | 382 | 79% | < .001 | < .001 |
ORR (CT) | Whole, relapsed | 164 | 173 | 95% | 238 | 304 | 78% | < .001 | < .001 |
ORR (CT) | Whole, refractory | 179 | 213 | 84% | 62 | 78 | 79% | .36 | .84 |
ORR (CT) | Whole, stage IV | 90 | 109 | 83% | 88 | 117 | 75% | .18 | .020 |
CMR ICE/BeGEV§ | PET | 292 | 386 | 76% | 105 | 157 | 67% | .025 | .0017 |
CMR ICE/BeGEV | Matched‡ | 193 | 240 | 80% | 93 | 137 | 68% | .005 | .0040 |
CMR ICE/BeGEV | PET, relapsed | 148 | 173 | 86% | 67 | 90 | 74% | .030 | .007 |
CMR ICE/BeGEV | PET, refractory | 144 | 213 | 68% | 38 | 67 | 57% | .067 | .15 |
CMR ICE/BeGEV | PET, stage IV | 74 | 109 | 68% | 39 | 60 | 65% | .69 | .11 |
3The PET dataset is the whole data set excluding patients from the study of Josting et al, in which response assessment was done by conventional CT scan only.
BeGEV, bendamustine, gemcitabine, etoposide, and vinorelbine; multivar, multivariable logistic regression analysis.
P values from χ2 comparison of BV vs chemotherapy cohorts.
P values from multivariable logistic regression comparing BV vs chemotherapy cohorts corrected for baseline characteristics: R/R status, stage, B symptoms, extranodal disease, bulky disease, and primary treatment with escBEACOPP.
For CMR calculations in the matched data set, patients from the study of Josting et al have been removed from the chemotherapy cohort, resulting in a smaller chemotherapy cohort of n = 137 patients instead of n = 240.
Comparison of pre-ASCT CMR rates measured after first sequential chemotherapy only. In the study of Moskowitz et al patients received sequential ICE and GVD chemotherapy in case of no CMR. In this comparison the response after ICE only is used in the chemotherapy cohort.