Table 1

RAMs used in medical inpatients

RAMPoints
Padua VTE RAM: score ≥4 indicates high VTE risk*   
Reduced mobility 
Active cancer 
Previous VTE (excluding superficial thrombophlebitis) 
Known thrombophilic condition 
Recent trauma and/or surgery (<1 mo) 
Elderly age (ie, >70 y) 
Heart and/or respiratory failure 
Acute myocardial infarction or ischemic stroke 
Ongoing hormonal treatment 
Obesity (body mass index >30) 
Acute infection and/or rheumatologic disorder 
IMPROVE VTE RAM: score ≥2 indicates increased VTE risk   
Previous VTE 
Known thrombophilia  
Lower limb paralysis§  
Active cancer 
Immobilization ≥7 d 
ICU/CCU stay 
Age >60 y 
IMPROVE bleeding RAM: score ≥7 indicates high bleeding risk   
Renal failure (GFR 30-59 vs ≥60 mL/min per m2
Male vs female 
Age 40-80 vs <40 y 1.5 
Current cancer 
Rheumatic disease 
Central venous catheter 
ICU/Critical Care Unit stay 2.5 
Renal failure (GFR <30 vs ≥60 mL/min per square meter) 2.5 
Hepatic failure (INR > 1.5) 2.5 
Age ≥85 y vs <40 y 3.5 
Platelet count <50 × 109/L 
Bleeding in 3 mo before admission 
Active gastroduodenal ulcer 4. 5 
RAMPoints
Padua VTE RAM: score ≥4 indicates high VTE risk*   
Reduced mobility 
Active cancer 
Previous VTE (excluding superficial thrombophlebitis) 
Known thrombophilic condition 
Recent trauma and/or surgery (<1 mo) 
Elderly age (ie, >70 y) 
Heart and/or respiratory failure 
Acute myocardial infarction or ischemic stroke 
Ongoing hormonal treatment 
Obesity (body mass index >30) 
Acute infection and/or rheumatologic disorder 
IMPROVE VTE RAM: score ≥2 indicates increased VTE risk   
Previous VTE 
Known thrombophilia  
Lower limb paralysis§  
Active cancer 
Immobilization ≥7 d 
ICU/CCU stay 
Age >60 y 
IMPROVE bleeding RAM: score ≥7 indicates high bleeding risk   
Renal failure (GFR 30-59 vs ≥60 mL/min per m2
Male vs female 
Age 40-80 vs <40 y 1.5 
Current cancer 
Rheumatic disease 
Central venous catheter 
ICU/Critical Care Unit stay 2.5 
Renal failure (GFR <30 vs ≥60 mL/min per square meter) 2.5 
Hepatic failure (INR > 1.5) 2.5 
Age ≥85 y vs <40 y 3.5 
Platelet count <50 × 109/L 
Bleeding in 3 mo before admission 
Active gastroduodenal ulcer 4. 5 

CI, confidence interval; CCU, Coronary Care Unit; GFR, glomerular filtration rate; ICU, Intensive Care Unit; INR, international normalized ratio.

VTE incidence without VTE prophylaxis:

Padua score 0 to 3: 0.3%

Padua score ≥ 4: 11%

Among at-risk patients (Padua score ≥ 4)

Overall VTE hazard ratio (HR), 32 (95% CI, 4.1-251)

Incidence of VTE

No prophylaxis: 11%

With prophylaxis: 2.2%

VTE HR with prophylaxis, 0.13 (95% CI, 0.04-0.4)

Incidence of major or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding with prophylaxis = 1.6% (95% CI, 0.5-4.6)

Interpretation: among at-risk patients (Padua score ≥ 4), the reduction in VTE appears to outweigh the increased risk of bleeding with pharmacologic prophylaxis.

A total of 69% of patients in this study37 were low risk for VTE (score 0 or 1).

Three-month rate of symptomatic VTE:

IMPROVE VTE score 0 or 1: 0.5%

IMPROVE VTE score 2 or 3: 1.5%

IMPROVE VTE score ≥ 4: 5.7%.

Incidence of major bleeding/any bleeding:

IMPROVE bleeding score < 7: 0.4%/1.5%

IMPROVE bleeding score ≥ 7: 4.1%/7.9%.

*

A total of 60.3% of patients in this study were low risk (Padua score 0-3). VTE prophylaxis was administered by provider choice from among several medications and with or without concomitant compression stockings.36 

Risk level: score of 0 or 1 = low risk, score of 2 or 3 = moderate risk; score ≥ 4 = high risk. For scores ≥ 2, VTE prophylaxis is indicated.

Congenital or acquired thrombophilic condition (eg, factor V Leiden, lupus anticoagulant, protein C, or protein S deficiency).

§

Leg falls to bed by 5 seconds but has some effort against gravity using the National Institutes of Health stroke scale.

About 90% of patients in this study40 were low risk for bleeding (score < 7).

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal