Table 3.

Treatment received in 2 groups of HIV–associated aggressive B lymphomas with or without MYC rearrangement

Patients with MYC+
n = 43
Patients with MYC
n = 112
Total
N = 155
P value
Rituximab 41 (95%) 99 (88%) 140 (90%) ns 
CHOP/CHOP-like 15 (35%) 76 (68%) 91 (59%) .0001 
Infusional therapy 8 (19%) 9 (8%) 17 (11%) .063 
DA-EPOCH 12  
CDE  
iCT 19 (44%) 23 (20%) 42 (27%) .003 
CARMEN Regimen28  10  
GMALL  
CODOX IVAC  
CT + ASCT consolidation 15 18  
Other   
Palliative care 1 (2%) 4 (3%) 5 (3%) ns 
CNS prophylaxis 32/37 (86%) 62/94 (66%) 94/131 (72%) .011 
IT (MTX ± ARA-C) 24 55 79  
Iv MTX ± IT 15  
Radiotherapy 2 (5%) 9 (8%) 11 (7%) ns 
Patients with MYC+
n = 43
Patients with MYC
n = 112
Total
N = 155
P value
Rituximab 41 (95%) 99 (88%) 140 (90%) ns 
CHOP/CHOP-like 15 (35%) 76 (68%) 91 (59%) .0001 
Infusional therapy 8 (19%) 9 (8%) 17 (11%) .063 
DA-EPOCH 12  
CDE  
iCT 19 (44%) 23 (20%) 42 (27%) .003 
CARMEN Regimen28  10  
GMALL  
CODOX IVAC  
CT + ASCT consolidation 15 18  
Other   
Palliative care 1 (2%) 4 (3%) 5 (3%) ns 
CNS prophylaxis 32/37 (86%) 62/94 (66%) 94/131 (72%) .011 
IT (MTX ± ARA-C) 24 55 79  
Iv MTX ± IT 15  
Radiotherapy 2 (5%) 9 (8%) 11 (7%) ns 

IT, intrathecal; ns, not significant.

Mainly CHOP regimen.

Other terapies included HD MTX plus HD ARAC, as well as stanford regimen for Burkitt.

Denominators regard assessed patients.

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal