Table 2.

Univariable and multivariable ordinal regression models assessing association between virtual vs in-person frailty assessment and odds of classifying patients as frail

Frailty measureIn-person assessmentVirtual assessment, OR (95% CI)P
Univariable    
 Frailty (overall) Reference 0.76 (0.52-1.11) .155 
 Frailty (phenotype) Reference 0.66 (0.45-0.98) .040 
 Frailty (deficit accumulation) Reference 0.75 (0.51-1.11) .154 
Multivariable*    
 Frailty (overall) Reference 0.86 (0.56-1.31) .467 
 Frailty (phenotype) Reference 0.73 (0.48-1.11) .139 
 Frailty (deficit accumulation) Reference 0.88 (0.55-1.37) .563 
Frailty measureIn-person assessmentVirtual assessment, OR (95% CI)P
Univariable    
 Frailty (overall) Reference 0.76 (0.52-1.11) .155 
 Frailty (phenotype) Reference 0.66 (0.45-0.98) .040 
 Frailty (deficit accumulation) Reference 0.75 (0.51-1.11) .154 
Multivariable*    
 Frailty (overall) Reference 0.86 (0.56-1.31) .467 
 Frailty (phenotype) Reference 0.73 (0.48-1.11) .139 
 Frailty (deficit accumulation) Reference 0.88 (0.55-1.37) .563 
*

Adjusting for age, sex, disease type, and ECOG PS.

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal