Table 1.

ELN 2021 MFC-MRD recommendations based on a Delphi poll

No.Multiparameter flow cytometry MRD recommendationLoEGoRLoA (%)
A1 When available, a diagnostic sample is preferred to:
1. determine if a patient has a diagnostic flow cytometric MRD target, and
2. assess treatment efficacy on potential clearance of the diagnostic LAIP populations. 
94 
A2 Implementation of a minimum required set of tubes/ fluorochromes combination is a prerequisite for harmonized LAIP/DfN MRD detection, analysis and reporting. 94 
A3 We recommend harmonized use of the integrated diagnostic LAIP and DfN strategy for MRD detection that incorporates the core MRD markers CD34, CD117, CD45, CD33, CD13, CD56, CD7, and HLA-DR, to assess all samples. 88 
A4 Particular attention should be devoted to evaluating the expression of the identified aberrant immunophenotypes in control samples that include regenerating BM. 88 
A5 When immunophenotypic abnormalities in specific samples may reflect transient features of regenerating or “stressed” hematopoiesis, the MRD report should comment on this possibility and note that a repeat sample in 2-4 wk, if clinically indicated, may be informative. 94 
A6 Request first-pull BM aspirate for MRD, and process sample within 3 days of storage, undiluted, in ambient conditions. 94 
A7 For samples stored at ambient temperature >3 d, the MRD report should make specific note of potentially compromised cell viability. 94 
A8 Explore strategies to assess hemodilution that can be incorporated and reported as part of the MRD assay. 88 
A9 For clinical decision making, MRD assessment should be performed with a qualified assay, as based on the guidelines for rare events in MFC. 76 
A10 To ensure the best quality of relevant events acquisition, use a gating syntax including FSC vs time and doublet exclusion plots. 81 
A11 The standard for determining MFC MRD negativity is the acquisition of >500 000 CD45+ cells and ≥100 viable cells in the blast compartment assessed for the best aberrancy(ies) available. 76 
A12 LLOD and LLOQ should be calculated to assess MFC-MRD assay performance. 93 
No.Multiparameter flow cytometry MRD recommendationLoEGoRLoA (%)
A1 When available, a diagnostic sample is preferred to:
1. determine if a patient has a diagnostic flow cytometric MRD target, and
2. assess treatment efficacy on potential clearance of the diagnostic LAIP populations. 
94 
A2 Implementation of a minimum required set of tubes/ fluorochromes combination is a prerequisite for harmonized LAIP/DfN MRD detection, analysis and reporting. 94 
A3 We recommend harmonized use of the integrated diagnostic LAIP and DfN strategy for MRD detection that incorporates the core MRD markers CD34, CD117, CD45, CD33, CD13, CD56, CD7, and HLA-DR, to assess all samples. 88 
A4 Particular attention should be devoted to evaluating the expression of the identified aberrant immunophenotypes in control samples that include regenerating BM. 88 
A5 When immunophenotypic abnormalities in specific samples may reflect transient features of regenerating or “stressed” hematopoiesis, the MRD report should comment on this possibility and note that a repeat sample in 2-4 wk, if clinically indicated, may be informative. 94 
A6 Request first-pull BM aspirate for MRD, and process sample within 3 days of storage, undiluted, in ambient conditions. 94 
A7 For samples stored at ambient temperature >3 d, the MRD report should make specific note of potentially compromised cell viability. 94 
A8 Explore strategies to assess hemodilution that can be incorporated and reported as part of the MRD assay. 88 
A9 For clinical decision making, MRD assessment should be performed with a qualified assay, as based on the guidelines for rare events in MFC. 76 
A10 To ensure the best quality of relevant events acquisition, use a gating syntax including FSC vs time and doublet exclusion plots. 81 
A11 The standard for determining MFC MRD negativity is the acquisition of >500 000 CD45+ cells and ≥100 viable cells in the blast compartment assessed for the best aberrancy(ies) available. 76 
A12 LLOD and LLOQ should be calculated to assess MFC-MRD assay performance. 93 

GoR, grade of recommendation; LLOD, lower limit of detection; LLOQ, lower limit of quantification; LoA, level of agreement; LoE, level of evidence.

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal