Table 5.

HCT using alternative donors in myelofibrosis

ReferenceDonor typenConditioningGVHD prophylaxisOS (95% CI)NRM (95% CI)Graft failureGVHD
Raj et al. (2019)55  Mismatched related donor 56 MAC (70%)/RIC (30%) PTCy in 79% 56% (41%-70%) at 2 y 38% (24%-51%) at 2 y Primary 9%
Secondary 13% 
aGVHD* 28%
cGVHD 45% at 1 y 
Murata et al. (2019)56  Unrelated cord blood 13 — — 48% at 1 y
27% at 4 y 
41% (22%-60%) at 1 y
62% (35%-81%) at 4 y 
— aGVHD* 31%
cGVHD 15% at 1 y 
Kunte et al. (2020)54  Haploidentical 58 NMA (52%)/RIC (45%) PTCy in 100% 69% (55%-80%) at 2 y 21% (11%-34%) at 2 y Primary 9% aGVHD* 44% at 6 m
cGVHD 31% at 2 y 
ReferenceDonor typenConditioningGVHD prophylaxisOS (95% CI)NRM (95% CI)Graft failureGVHD
Raj et al. (2019)55  Mismatched related donor 56 MAC (70%)/RIC (30%) PTCy in 79% 56% (41%-70%) at 2 y 38% (24%-51%) at 2 y Primary 9%
Secondary 13% 
aGVHD* 28%
cGVHD 45% at 1 y 
Murata et al. (2019)56  Unrelated cord blood 13 — — 48% at 1 y
27% at 4 y 
41% (22%-60%) at 1 y
62% (35%-81%) at 4 y 
— aGVHD* 31%
cGVHD 15% at 1 y 
Kunte et al. (2020)54  Haploidentical 58 NMA (52%)/RIC (45%) PTCy in 100% 69% (55%-80%) at 2 y 21% (11%-34%) at 2 y Primary 9% aGVHD* 44% at 6 m
cGVHD 31% at 2 y 
*

Acute GVHD encompasses grades II to IV.

MAC, myeloablative conditioning; NMA, non-myeloablative; PTCy, posttransplant cyclophosphamide.

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal