Novel agent–based salvage regimens in second-line therapy in cHL
Regimen . | Phase . | N . | Primary refractory, n . | Relapsed, n . | CMR, % . | PFS, % . | Reference . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BV based salvage regimens | |||||||
Sequential BV and chemotherapy | |||||||
BV→augmented ICE | 2 | 45 | 25 | 20 | 76* | 82 at 3 y | 44 |
BV→salvage therapy | 2 | 57 | 35 | 22 | 74† | 71 at 2 y | 45 |
Combination BV and chemotherapy/ novel agents | |||||||
BV + ICE | |||||||
BV-ICE x 2 | 1/2 | 16 | 11 | 5 | 69 | Not reported | 47 |
BV-ICE x 2-3 | 2 | 42‡ | 12 | 30 | 69 | 69 at 1 y | 48 |
BV + ESHAP | 1/2 | 66 | 40 | 26 | 70 | 71 at 30 mo | 49 |
BV + DHAP | 2 | 55 | 23 | 32 | 81 | 74 at 2 y | 50 |
BV + Gemcitabine | 1/2 | 45§ | 29 | 16 | 67 | Not reached | 51 |
BV + bendamustine | 1/2 | 55 | 28 | 27 | 74 | 62.6 at 2 y | 52 |
BV + nivolumab | 1/2 | 91 | 38 | 53 | 67 | 77 at 3 y | 53,54 |
Anti–PD-1 based salvage regimens | |||||||
N±ICE‖ | 2 | 39 | 18 | 21 | 86¶ | 79 at 1 y | 58 |
Pem-ICE | 2 | 23 | 8 | 15 | 96 | Not reported | 59 |
Pem-GVD# | 2 | 39 | 16 | 23 | 95 | Not reached | 60,61 |
Regimen . | Phase . | N . | Primary refractory, n . | Relapsed, n . | CMR, % . | PFS, % . | Reference . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BV based salvage regimens | |||||||
Sequential BV and chemotherapy | |||||||
BV→augmented ICE | 2 | 45 | 25 | 20 | 76* | 82 at 3 y | 44 |
BV→salvage therapy | 2 | 57 | 35 | 22 | 74† | 71 at 2 y | 45 |
Combination BV and chemotherapy/ novel agents | |||||||
BV + ICE | |||||||
BV-ICE x 2 | 1/2 | 16 | 11 | 5 | 69 | Not reported | 47 |
BV-ICE x 2-3 | 2 | 42‡ | 12 | 30 | 69 | 69 at 1 y | 48 |
BV + ESHAP | 1/2 | 66 | 40 | 26 | 70 | 71 at 30 mo | 49 |
BV + DHAP | 2 | 55 | 23 | 32 | 81 | 74 at 2 y | 50 |
BV + Gemcitabine | 1/2 | 45§ | 29 | 16 | 67 | Not reached | 51 |
BV + bendamustine | 1/2 | 55 | 28 | 27 | 74 | 62.6 at 2 y | 52 |
BV + nivolumab | 1/2 | 91 | 38 | 53 | 67 | 77 at 3 y | 53,54 |
Anti–PD-1 based salvage regimens | |||||||
N±ICE‖ | 2 | 39 | 18 | 21 | 86¶ | 79 at 1 y | 58 |
Pem-ICE | 2 | 23 | 8 | 15 | 96 | Not reported | 59 |
Pem-GVD# | 2 | 39 | 16 | 23 | 95 | Not reached | 60,61 |
CMR was determined by PET scan.
DHAP, dexamethasone, cytarabine, cisplatin; ESHAP, etoposide, cytarabine, cisplatin, methylprednisolone; N±ICE, nivolumab with or without ICE.
27% achieved CMR to BV alone, and 76% to both.
43% achieved CMR to BV alone, and 74% to both.
Only 39 patients were evaluable for efficacy.
Only 42 patients were evaluable for efficacy.
Patients received nivolumab 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks for 6 cycles. Patients in CR at cycle 6 proceeded to auto-HCT; those not in CR received nivo+ICE for 2 cycles.
End of nivolumab alone CR rate, 70%; end of nivo+ICE CR rate, 86%.
Thirty-seven patients were evaluable for response.