Literature summary: cellular responses
Study, year . | Design . | Location . | Anti-CD20 drug . | Population . | N . | Median age, y* . | Sex, % F . | Interval between anti-CD20 and vaccination . | Vaccine type . | Measurement of T-cell response and outcomes . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Arad et al, 201139 | Cohort | Israel | RTX | RA | 29 | 62 | 79 | 16 patients: <5 mo; 13 patients: >5 mo | Seasonal influenza | Measurement: Flow cytometry for activated CD4 T cells; influenza-specific cells were defined as the percentage of CD69+/IFN-γ–producing cells within the total CD4+ T-cell population in the antigen-stimulated cultures subtracted by those in the negative control cultures Outcome: No difference in percentage increase in influenza-specific CD4+ subsets in patients treated with anti-CD20 therapy compared with DMARD-treated patients (median, 0.1% to 0.3% and 0.1% to 0.2%, respectively); healthy controls had higher baseline influenza-specific CD4+ T cells, but their CD4+ subsets decreased by half postvaccination (0.6% to 0.3%) |
de Lavallade et al, 201140 | Cohort | United Kingdom | RTX | B-cell malignancies | 12 | 57† | 40† | 19 mo (range, 2-83 mo) | Pandemic influenza | Measurement: Effector function of antigen-specific CD8+ and CD4+ T cells assessed by intracellular-cytokine staining for IFN-γ and TNF-α; response considered positive if combined percentage of H1N1-specific TNF-α plus IFN-γ–producing CD4+ or CD8+ T cells was twofold or higher compared with background level (nonstimulated PBMCs) and if there was a minimum of 0.05% H1N1-specific TNF-α plus IFN-γ–producing CD4+ or CD8+ T cells (after subtracting background) Outcome: Cellular data only available for all B-cell malignancy patients together (not RTX specific); 7% pre- and 36% postvaccine had H1N1-specific T-cell response; no effect of prior chemotherapy; healthy controls had 44% pre and 48% post; no effect of prior chemotherapy on induction of H1N1-specific T cells after 2 doses of vaccine (data NR) |
Eisenberg et al, 201342 | Cohort | United States | RTX | Rheumatologic disease | 17 | 49 | 94 | 7-9 mo | Seasonal influenza | Measurement: T-cell ELISPOTs were performed using a standard γ-IFN T-cell ELISPOT assay Outcome: T-cell responses similar in anti-CD20–treated patients at baseline compared with healthy controls, but no significant increases after vaccination, no increase in proliferation (data NR); no changes in the T-cell repertoire as detected by spectratyping over time (data NR) |
Muller et al, 201343 | Cohort | Switzerland | RTX | Autoimmune rheumatic diseases | 16 | 45 | 88 | Median, 6 mo (range, 1-36 mo) | Pandemic influenza | Measurement: Presence of IFN-γ–producing 2009 H1N1 influenza virus–specific CD4+ and CD8+ T cells Outcomes: After first vaccination, virus-specific CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell responses were significantly lower in patients with low B cells than those with normal B cells; booster vaccination stimulated the antiviral T-cell response only in patients with low B cells |
Nazi et al, 201338 | Phase 3 substudy | Canada | RTX | ITP | 17 | 40 | 71 | 6 mo | Tetanus toxoid | Measurement: IFN-γ ELISPOT assay to measure frequency of tetanus toxoid–specific T cells Outcomes: Mean number of IFN-γ–producing T cells was reduced in patients who had received rituximab compared with placebo at 1 wk (38 cells vs 93 cells per 5 × 105 total cells) and 1 mo (14 cells vs 43 cells per 5 × 105 total cells) |
Parrino et al, 201741 | Phase 1 | Worldwide | RTX | B-cell lymphoma | 80 | 61 | 54 | On active treatment | Inactivated VZV | Measurement: IFN-γ ELISPOT assay was used to detect the presence of IFN-γ–secreting VZV-specific cells from PBMCs before and after immunization Outcome: GMFR met primary outcome at 4.34 (95% CI, 3.01-6.24) |
Study, year . | Design . | Location . | Anti-CD20 drug . | Population . | N . | Median age, y* . | Sex, % F . | Interval between anti-CD20 and vaccination . | Vaccine type . | Measurement of T-cell response and outcomes . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Arad et al, 201139 | Cohort | Israel | RTX | RA | 29 | 62 | 79 | 16 patients: <5 mo; 13 patients: >5 mo | Seasonal influenza | Measurement: Flow cytometry for activated CD4 T cells; influenza-specific cells were defined as the percentage of CD69+/IFN-γ–producing cells within the total CD4+ T-cell population in the antigen-stimulated cultures subtracted by those in the negative control cultures Outcome: No difference in percentage increase in influenza-specific CD4+ subsets in patients treated with anti-CD20 therapy compared with DMARD-treated patients (median, 0.1% to 0.3% and 0.1% to 0.2%, respectively); healthy controls had higher baseline influenza-specific CD4+ T cells, but their CD4+ subsets decreased by half postvaccination (0.6% to 0.3%) |
de Lavallade et al, 201140 | Cohort | United Kingdom | RTX | B-cell malignancies | 12 | 57† | 40† | 19 mo (range, 2-83 mo) | Pandemic influenza | Measurement: Effector function of antigen-specific CD8+ and CD4+ T cells assessed by intracellular-cytokine staining for IFN-γ and TNF-α; response considered positive if combined percentage of H1N1-specific TNF-α plus IFN-γ–producing CD4+ or CD8+ T cells was twofold or higher compared with background level (nonstimulated PBMCs) and if there was a minimum of 0.05% H1N1-specific TNF-α plus IFN-γ–producing CD4+ or CD8+ T cells (after subtracting background) Outcome: Cellular data only available for all B-cell malignancy patients together (not RTX specific); 7% pre- and 36% postvaccine had H1N1-specific T-cell response; no effect of prior chemotherapy; healthy controls had 44% pre and 48% post; no effect of prior chemotherapy on induction of H1N1-specific T cells after 2 doses of vaccine (data NR) |
Eisenberg et al, 201342 | Cohort | United States | RTX | Rheumatologic disease | 17 | 49 | 94 | 7-9 mo | Seasonal influenza | Measurement: T-cell ELISPOTs were performed using a standard γ-IFN T-cell ELISPOT assay Outcome: T-cell responses similar in anti-CD20–treated patients at baseline compared with healthy controls, but no significant increases after vaccination, no increase in proliferation (data NR); no changes in the T-cell repertoire as detected by spectratyping over time (data NR) |
Muller et al, 201343 | Cohort | Switzerland | RTX | Autoimmune rheumatic diseases | 16 | 45 | 88 | Median, 6 mo (range, 1-36 mo) | Pandemic influenza | Measurement: Presence of IFN-γ–producing 2009 H1N1 influenza virus–specific CD4+ and CD8+ T cells Outcomes: After first vaccination, virus-specific CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell responses were significantly lower in patients with low B cells than those with normal B cells; booster vaccination stimulated the antiviral T-cell response only in patients with low B cells |
Nazi et al, 201338 | Phase 3 substudy | Canada | RTX | ITP | 17 | 40 | 71 | 6 mo | Tetanus toxoid | Measurement: IFN-γ ELISPOT assay to measure frequency of tetanus toxoid–specific T cells Outcomes: Mean number of IFN-γ–producing T cells was reduced in patients who had received rituximab compared with placebo at 1 wk (38 cells vs 93 cells per 5 × 105 total cells) and 1 mo (14 cells vs 43 cells per 5 × 105 total cells) |
Parrino et al, 201741 | Phase 1 | Worldwide | RTX | B-cell lymphoma | 80 | 61 | 54 | On active treatment | Inactivated VZV | Measurement: IFN-γ ELISPOT assay was used to detect the presence of IFN-γ–secreting VZV-specific cells from PBMCs before and after immunization Outcome: GMFR met primary outcome at 4.34 (95% CI, 3.01-6.24) |
DMARD, disease-modifying antirheumatic drug; ELISPOT, enzyme-linked immune absorbent spot; GMFR, geometric mean fold rise; PBMC, peripheral blood mononuclear cell; TNF, tumor necrosis factor; VZV, varicella zoster virus. See Table 1 for expansion of other abbreviations.
Median age; where not reported, mean age reported.
Rituximab-specific age and percentage female not reported, thus age and percentage female of entire study population reported.