Table 2.

Literature summary: cellular responses

Study, yearDesignLocationAnti-CD20 drugPopulationNMedian age, y*Sex, % FInterval between
anti-CD20 and vaccination
Vaccine typeMeasurement of T-cell response and outcomes
Arad et al, 201139  Cohort Israel RTX RA 29 62 79 16 patients: <5 mo;
13 patients: >5 mo 
Seasonal influenza Measurement: Flow cytometry for activated CD4 T cells; influenza-specific cells were defined as the percentage of CD69+/IFN-γ–producing cells within the total CD4+ T-cell population in the antigen-stimulated cultures subtracted by those in the negative control cultures
Outcome: No difference in percentage increase in influenza-specific CD4+ subsets in patients treated with anti-CD20 therapy compared with DMARD-treated patients (median, 0.1% to 0.3% and 0.1% to 0.2%, respectively); healthy controls had higher baseline influenza-specific CD4+ T cells, but their CD4+ subsets decreased by half postvaccination (0.6% to 0.3%) 
de Lavallade et al, 201140  Cohort United Kingdom RTX B-cell malignancies 12 57 40 19 mo (range, 2-83 mo) Pandemic influenza Measurement: Effector function of antigen-specific CD8+ and CD4+ T cells assessed by intracellular-cytokine staining for IFN-γ and TNF-α; response considered positive if combined percentage of H1N1-specific TNF-α plus IFN-γ–producing CD4+ or CD8+ T cells was twofold or higher compared with background level (nonstimulated PBMCs) and if there was a minimum of 0.05% H1N1-specific TNF-α plus IFN-γ–producing CD4+ or CD8+ T cells (after subtracting background)
Outcome: Cellular data only available for all B-cell malignancy patients together (not RTX specific); 7% pre- and 36% postvaccine had H1N1-specific T-cell response; no effect of prior chemotherapy; healthy controls had 44% pre and 48% post; no effect of prior chemotherapy on induction of H1N1-specific T cells after 2 doses of vaccine (data NR) 
Eisenberg et al, 201342  Cohort United States RTX Rheumatologic disease 17 49 94 7-9 mo Seasonal influenza Measurement: T-cell ELISPOTs were performed using a standard γ-IFN T-cell ELISPOT assay
Outcome: T-cell responses similar in anti-CD20–treated patients at baseline compared with healthy controls, but no significant increases after vaccination, no increase in proliferation (data NR); no changes in the T-cell repertoire as detected by spectratyping over time (data NR) 
Muller et al, 201343  Cohort Switzerland RTX Autoimmune rheumatic diseases 16 45 88 Median, 6 mo (range, 1-36 mo) Pandemic influenza Measurement: Presence of IFN-γ–producing 2009 H1N1 influenza virus–specific CD4+ and CD8+ T cells
Outcomes: After first vaccination, virus-specific CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell responses were significantly lower in patients with low B cells than those with normal B cells; booster vaccination stimulated the antiviral T-cell response only in patients with low B cells 
Nazi et al, 201338  Phase 3 substudy Canada RTX ITP 17 40 71 6 mo Tetanus toxoid Measurement: IFN-γ ELISPOT assay to measure frequency of tetanus toxoid–specific T cells
Outcomes: Mean number of IFN-γ–producing T cells was reduced in patients who had received rituximab compared with placebo at 1 wk (38 cells vs 93 cells per 5 × 105 total cells) and 1 mo (14 cells vs 43 cells per 5 × 105 total cells) 
Parrino et al, 201741  Phase 1 Worldwide RTX B-cell lymphoma 80 61 54 On active treatment Inactivated VZV Measurement: IFN-γ ELISPOT assay was used to detect the presence of IFN-γ–secreting VZV-specific cells from PBMCs before and after immunization
Outcome: GMFR met primary outcome at 4.34 (95% CI, 3.01-6.24) 
Study, yearDesignLocationAnti-CD20 drugPopulationNMedian age, y*Sex, % FInterval between
anti-CD20 and vaccination
Vaccine typeMeasurement of T-cell response and outcomes
Arad et al, 201139  Cohort Israel RTX RA 29 62 79 16 patients: <5 mo;
13 patients: >5 mo 
Seasonal influenza Measurement: Flow cytometry for activated CD4 T cells; influenza-specific cells were defined as the percentage of CD69+/IFN-γ–producing cells within the total CD4+ T-cell population in the antigen-stimulated cultures subtracted by those in the negative control cultures
Outcome: No difference in percentage increase in influenza-specific CD4+ subsets in patients treated with anti-CD20 therapy compared with DMARD-treated patients (median, 0.1% to 0.3% and 0.1% to 0.2%, respectively); healthy controls had higher baseline influenza-specific CD4+ T cells, but their CD4+ subsets decreased by half postvaccination (0.6% to 0.3%) 
de Lavallade et al, 201140  Cohort United Kingdom RTX B-cell malignancies 12 57 40 19 mo (range, 2-83 mo) Pandemic influenza Measurement: Effector function of antigen-specific CD8+ and CD4+ T cells assessed by intracellular-cytokine staining for IFN-γ and TNF-α; response considered positive if combined percentage of H1N1-specific TNF-α plus IFN-γ–producing CD4+ or CD8+ T cells was twofold or higher compared with background level (nonstimulated PBMCs) and if there was a minimum of 0.05% H1N1-specific TNF-α plus IFN-γ–producing CD4+ or CD8+ T cells (after subtracting background)
Outcome: Cellular data only available for all B-cell malignancy patients together (not RTX specific); 7% pre- and 36% postvaccine had H1N1-specific T-cell response; no effect of prior chemotherapy; healthy controls had 44% pre and 48% post; no effect of prior chemotherapy on induction of H1N1-specific T cells after 2 doses of vaccine (data NR) 
Eisenberg et al, 201342  Cohort United States RTX Rheumatologic disease 17 49 94 7-9 mo Seasonal influenza Measurement: T-cell ELISPOTs were performed using a standard γ-IFN T-cell ELISPOT assay
Outcome: T-cell responses similar in anti-CD20–treated patients at baseline compared with healthy controls, but no significant increases after vaccination, no increase in proliferation (data NR); no changes in the T-cell repertoire as detected by spectratyping over time (data NR) 
Muller et al, 201343  Cohort Switzerland RTX Autoimmune rheumatic diseases 16 45 88 Median, 6 mo (range, 1-36 mo) Pandemic influenza Measurement: Presence of IFN-γ–producing 2009 H1N1 influenza virus–specific CD4+ and CD8+ T cells
Outcomes: After first vaccination, virus-specific CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell responses were significantly lower in patients with low B cells than those with normal B cells; booster vaccination stimulated the antiviral T-cell response only in patients with low B cells 
Nazi et al, 201338  Phase 3 substudy Canada RTX ITP 17 40 71 6 mo Tetanus toxoid Measurement: IFN-γ ELISPOT assay to measure frequency of tetanus toxoid–specific T cells
Outcomes: Mean number of IFN-γ–producing T cells was reduced in patients who had received rituximab compared with placebo at 1 wk (38 cells vs 93 cells per 5 × 105 total cells) and 1 mo (14 cells vs 43 cells per 5 × 105 total cells) 
Parrino et al, 201741  Phase 1 Worldwide RTX B-cell lymphoma 80 61 54 On active treatment Inactivated VZV Measurement: IFN-γ ELISPOT assay was used to detect the presence of IFN-γ–secreting VZV-specific cells from PBMCs before and after immunization
Outcome: GMFR met primary outcome at 4.34 (95% CI, 3.01-6.24) 

DMARD, disease-modifying antirheumatic drug; ELISPOT, enzyme-linked immune absorbent spot; GMFR, geometric mean fold rise; PBMC, peripheral blood mononuclear cell; TNF, tumor necrosis factor; VZV, varicella zoster virus. See Table 1 for expansion of other abbreviations.

*

Median age; where not reported, mean age reported.

Rituximab-specific age and percentage female not reported, thus age and percentage female of entire study population reported.

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal