Table 1.

Demographics and baseline characteristics of the EORTC QLQ-C30– and EQ-5D-5L–evaluable populations

Parameter/categoryEORTC QLQ-C30–evaluable population (n = 181)*EQ-5D-5L–evaluable population (n = 186)
Age, y   
 Mean (SD) 60.2 (14.0) 60.1 (13.9) 
 Median 63.0 63.0 
Age group, n (%), y   
 <65 105 (58) 109 (59) 
 ≥65 76 (42) 77 (41) 
 <75 162 (90) 166 (89) 
 ≥75 19 (10) 20 (11) 
Sex, n (%)   
 Male 117 (65) 121 (65) 
 Female 64 (35) 65 (35) 
Race, n (%)   
 White 155 (86) 158 (85) 
 Other 17 (9) 18 (10) 
 Unknown/missing 9 (5) 10 (5) 
Ethnicity, n (%)   
 Hispanic or Latino 20 (11) 21 (11) 
 Not Hispanic/Latino 153 (85) 157 (84) 
 Unknown 8 (4) 8 (4) 
ECOG PS at screening, n (%)   
 0 73 (40) 73 (39) 
 1 107 (59) 112 (60) 
 2 1 (1) 1 (1) 
Pre–liso-cel ECOG PS, n (%)   
 0 44 (24) 44 (24) 
 1 127 (70) 132 (71) 
 2 8 (4) 8 (4) 
 3 1 (1) 1 (1) 
Type of B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma, n (%)   
 DLBCL NOS 98 (54) 99 (53) 
 HGBCL 19 (10) 21 (11) 
 DLBCL transformed from indolent lymphoma 50 (28) 51 (27) 
  Follicular lymphoma 41 (23) 42 (23) 
  CLL/SLL 2 (1) 2 (1) 
  Marginal zone lymphoma 5 (3) 5 (3) 
  Other 2 (1) 2 (1) 
 PMBCL 13 (7) 14 (8) 
 FL3B 1 (1) 1 (1) 
Refractory or relapsed, n (%)§   
 Refractory 141 (78) 145 (78) 
 Relapsed 40 (22) 41 (22) 
Chemotherapy refractory or chemotherapy sensitive, n (%)||   
 Chemotherapy refractory 122 (67) 125 (67) 
 Chemotherapy sensitive 59 (33) 61 (33) 
Active CNS disease at first liso-cel infusion, n (%)   
 Yes 3 (2) 3 (2) 
 No 178 (98) 183 (98) 
Number of prior systemic treatment regimens, n (%)   
 1 5 (3) 6 (3) 
 2 92 (51) 93 (50) 
 3 45 (25) 47 (25) 
 4 23 (13) 24 (13) 
 5-8 16 (9) 16 (9) 
Best response to any prior therapy, n (%)   
 Complete response 106 (59) 110 (59) 
 Partial response 52 (29) 53 (28) 
 Stable disease 11 (6) 11 (6) 
 Progressive disease 12 (7) 12 (6) 
Time from diagnosis to first liso-cel infusion, months, mean (SD) 32.3 (35.7) 32.3 (35.4) 
Received bridging therapy, n (%)# 99 (55) 102 (55) 
Parameter/categoryEORTC QLQ-C30–evaluable population (n = 181)*EQ-5D-5L–evaluable population (n = 186)
Age, y   
 Mean (SD) 60.2 (14.0) 60.1 (13.9) 
 Median 63.0 63.0 
Age group, n (%), y   
 <65 105 (58) 109 (59) 
 ≥65 76 (42) 77 (41) 
 <75 162 (90) 166 (89) 
 ≥75 19 (10) 20 (11) 
Sex, n (%)   
 Male 117 (65) 121 (65) 
 Female 64 (35) 65 (35) 
Race, n (%)   
 White 155 (86) 158 (85) 
 Other 17 (9) 18 (10) 
 Unknown/missing 9 (5) 10 (5) 
Ethnicity, n (%)   
 Hispanic or Latino 20 (11) 21 (11) 
 Not Hispanic/Latino 153 (85) 157 (84) 
 Unknown 8 (4) 8 (4) 
ECOG PS at screening, n (%)   
 0 73 (40) 73 (39) 
 1 107 (59) 112 (60) 
 2 1 (1) 1 (1) 
Pre–liso-cel ECOG PS, n (%)   
 0 44 (24) 44 (24) 
 1 127 (70) 132 (71) 
 2 8 (4) 8 (4) 
 3 1 (1) 1 (1) 
Type of B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma, n (%)   
 DLBCL NOS 98 (54) 99 (53) 
 HGBCL 19 (10) 21 (11) 
 DLBCL transformed from indolent lymphoma 50 (28) 51 (27) 
  Follicular lymphoma 41 (23) 42 (23) 
  CLL/SLL 2 (1) 2 (1) 
  Marginal zone lymphoma 5 (3) 5 (3) 
  Other 2 (1) 2 (1) 
 PMBCL 13 (7) 14 (8) 
 FL3B 1 (1) 1 (1) 
Refractory or relapsed, n (%)§   
 Refractory 141 (78) 145 (78) 
 Relapsed 40 (22) 41 (22) 
Chemotherapy refractory or chemotherapy sensitive, n (%)||   
 Chemotherapy refractory 122 (67) 125 (67) 
 Chemotherapy sensitive 59 (33) 61 (33) 
Active CNS disease at first liso-cel infusion, n (%)   
 Yes 3 (2) 3 (2) 
 No 178 (98) 183 (98) 
Number of prior systemic treatment regimens, n (%)   
 1 5 (3) 6 (3) 
 2 92 (51) 93 (50) 
 3 45 (25) 47 (25) 
 4 23 (13) 24 (13) 
 5-8 16 (9) 16 (9) 
Best response to any prior therapy, n (%)   
 Complete response 106 (59) 110 (59) 
 Partial response 52 (29) 53 (28) 
 Stable disease 11 (6) 11 (6) 
 Progressive disease 12 (7) 12 (6) 
Time from diagnosis to first liso-cel infusion, months, mean (SD) 32.3 (35.7) 32.3 (35.4) 
Received bridging therapy, n (%)# 99 (55) 102 (55) 

CLL, chronic lymphocytic leukemia; CNS, central nervous system; ECOG PS, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status; FL3B, follicular lymphoma grade 3B; HGBCL, high-grade B-cell lymphoma; NOS, not otherwise specified; PMBCL, primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma; SLL, small lymphocytic lymphoma.

*

Liso-cel–treated patients for whom all scales were analyzable (ie, answers were provided for ≥50% of the items for each scale) at baseline, and at least 1 scale was amenable to postbaseline analysis.

Liso-cel–treated patients with baseline data for both the EQ-5D-5L index score and the VAS and at least 1 postbaseline assessment for the EQ-5D-5L index score or the VAS.

The most recent ECOG PS after lymphodepleting chemotherapy and before liso-cel infusion.

§

Relapse was defined as best response to last systemic or transplant treatment with curative intent of complete response; refractory was defined as best response of partial response, stable disease, or progressive disease.

||

Chemotherapy refractory was defined as stable disease or progressive disease during the last chemotherapy-containing regimen or relapse <12 months after autologous stem cell transplantation. Patients who did not fulfill these criteria were categorized as chemotherapy sensitive.

The original study protocol enrolled patients with at least 2 previous lines of treatment, but there was no requirement for at least 2 previous lines of systemic treatment. As a result, 9 enrolled patients had received only 1 previous line of systemic treatment (plus consolidation with hematopoietic stem cell transplantation or radiation therapy). During enrollment, the protocol was amended to require at least 2 previous lines of systemic treatment.

#

Systemic treatment and/or radiotherapy provided after consent and before lymphodepleting chemotherapy.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal