Table 3.

Derivation of the HIGH-2-LOW VTE RAM

Proposed risk factorOR (95% CI)Weight*Score distributionRisk stratification
History of CR-DVT (n = 81) 2.10 (0.80-5.53)   
Inpatient admission (30 d) (n = 280) 2.02 (1.06-3.86) 0 = 921  
GVHD grade 3 to 4 (30 d) (n = 127) 1.74 (0.77-3.91) 1 = 507 0 = low risk (n = 921) 
History of PE or LE-DVT (n = 52) 2.54 (0.92-7.05) 2 = 201 1 = intermediate (n = 507) 
Lymphoma diagnosis (n = 209) 3.47 (1.89-6.38) 3 = 60 2+ = high risk (n = 275) 
Obesity (BMI ≥35 kg/m2) (n = 61) 2.54 (1.26-5.13) 4 = 10  
WBC ≥11 × 109/L (30 d) (n = 202) 1.95 (0.99-3.84) 5 = 4  
Proposed risk factorOR (95% CI)Weight*Score distributionRisk stratification
History of CR-DVT (n = 81) 2.10 (0.80-5.53)   
Inpatient admission (30 d) (n = 280) 2.02 (1.06-3.86) 0 = 921  
GVHD grade 3 to 4 (30 d) (n = 127) 1.74 (0.77-3.91) 1 = 507 0 = low risk (n = 921) 
History of PE or LE-DVT (n = 52) 2.54 (0.92-7.05) 2 = 201 1 = intermediate (n = 507) 
Lymphoma diagnosis (n = 209) 3.47 (1.89-6.38) 3 = 60 2+ = high risk (n = 275) 
Obesity (BMI ≥35 kg/m2) (n = 61) 2.54 (1.26-5.13) 4 = 10  
WBC ≥11 × 109/L (30 d) (n = 202) 1.95 (0.99-3.84) 5 = 4  
*

The sum of the covariate weights was used to stratify risk of VTE: low risk = 0, intermediate risk = 1, and high risk ≥2. Baseline risk predictors were assessed at 30 d posttransplant, and binary VTE outcomes were assessed at 100 d posttransplant.

WBC, white blood cell count.

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal